ATFV vs. INCE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ATFV (Alger 35 ETF) and INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATFV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. ATFV is passively managed, while INCE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ATFV returned 12.98%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for INCE. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ATFV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for INCE.

Performance

ATFV vs. INCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATFV achieves a 13.28% return, which is significantly lower than INCE's 14.91% return.

ATFV

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 14.49%
• YTD: 13.28%
• 1Y: 29.89%
• 3Y*: 36.70%
• 5Y*: 12.98%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.16%

INCE

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 7.74%
• YTD: 14.91%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	$2.60M	$1.77M	$2.46M
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	$621.36K	$657.47K	$945.62K

ATFV vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	13.28%	38.20%	46.14%	32.75%	-35.97%	3.03%
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	14.91%	15.92%	10.70%	13.87%	-8.54%	12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between ATFV and INCE is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2021	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between ATFV and INCE has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ATFV vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ATFV	INCE
Technology	43.2%	3.6%
Communication Services	23.6%	2.4%
Industrials	10.3%	8.9%
Healthcare	8.9%	7.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	3.1%
Utilities	4.8%	6.8%
Financial Services	1.0%	13.3%
Basic Materials	-	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.3%
Energy	-	5.6%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

ATFV vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATFV

ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 43
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 41
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 43

INCE

INCE Risk / Return Rank: 96
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATFV vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATFV	INCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	3.09	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	4.48	-2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.58	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	5.24	-3.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	20.20	-15.25

ATFV vs. INCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the INCE Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATFV and INCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATFV vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and INCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATFV	INCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.34%	-33.95%	-11.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.29%	-4.90%	-13.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.01%	-14.01%	-15.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.34%	-18.40%	-26.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.38%	-0.16%	-5.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.46%	-3.22%	-14.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.06%	1.27%	+4.79%

Volatility

ATFV vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.46%. This indicates that ATFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATFV	INCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.08%	2.46%	+8.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.90%	6.15%	+15.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.92%	8.40%	+18.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.40%	13.25%	+14.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.01%	15.60%	+11.41%

ATFV vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATFV vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison

ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than INCE's 4.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.16%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	4.84%	4.71%	3.25%	1.75%	1.68%	1.41%	1.40%	1.31%	1.55%	1.44%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATFV and INCE in my portfolio?

ATFV and INCE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATFV or INCE?

ATFV has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to INCE (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATFV dropped -45.34% vs INCE's -33.95%.

Which ETF is better, ATFV or INCE?

On 5-year performance, ATFV leads with 12.98% vs 10.49% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ATFV or INCE?

Over the 5-year period, ATFV has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATFV or INCE?

INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ATFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATFV or INCE?

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 0.18% for ATFV.

What is the main difference between ATFV and INCE?

ATFV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Alger and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ATFV and 0.29% for INCE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.