ATFV vs. FBCG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG).

ATFV and FBCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATFV is a passively managed fund by Alger Group Holdings LLC that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on May 4, 2021. FBCG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020.

Performance

ATFV vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATFV vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	-10.04%	38.20%	46.14%	32.75%	-35.97%	4.19%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	-8.61%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-39.10%	14.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATFV achieves a -10.04% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's -8.61% return.

ATFV

• 1D: 4.80%
• 1M: -5.88%
• YTD: -10.04%
• 6M: -11.50%
• 1Y: 43.26%
• 3Y*: 29.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: 4.81%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -8.61%
• 6M: -6.56%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATFV vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

FBCG

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF

ATFV

Alger 35 ETF

Return for Risk

ATFV vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATFV

ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 81
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 64
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATFV vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATFV	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	0.97	+0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.54	+0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.22	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	1.65	+0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	5.92	+2.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATFV vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATFV and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATFV	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	0.97	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.67	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between ATFV and FBCG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ATFV vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than FBCG's 0.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	0.23%	0.20%	0.16%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Drawdowns

ATFV vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATFV	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.34%	-43.56%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.29%	-15.17%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.36%	-11.09%	-3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.36%	-11.79%	-6.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	4.23%	+1.04%

Volatility

ATFV vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 8.22%. This indicates that ATFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATFV	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.38%	8.22%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.50%	14.74%	+2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.67%	26.28%	+1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.63%	25.82%	+0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.63%	25.92%	+0.71%