ATFV vs. DARP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ATFV (Alger 35 ETF) and DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ATFV is passively managed, while DARP is actively managed. Over the past year, ATFV returned 48.62% vs 82.62% for DARP. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ATFV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DARP.

Performance

ATFV vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATFV achieves a 16.46% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 32.67% return.

ATFV

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: 8.35%
• YTD: 16.46%
• 6M: 16.04%
• 1Y: 48.62%
• 3Y*: 39.26%
• 5Y*: 15.56%
• 10Y*: —

DARP

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 8.18%
• YTD: 32.67%
• 6M: 34.22%
• 1Y: 82.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATFV vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	16.46%	38.20%	46.14%	17.09%
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	32.67%	40.19%	24.63%	6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ATFV and DARP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023	0.81

The correlation between ATFV and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

ATFV vs. DARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ATFV	DARP
Technology	42.1%	45.8%
Communication Services	25.8%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	6.6%
Healthcare	8.6%	1.4%
Industrials	8.2%	12.0%
Utilities	2.7%	5.4%
Financial Services	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	9.9%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

ATFV vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATFV

ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 56
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

DARP

DARP Risk / Return Rank: 91
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATFV vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATFV	DARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	3.59	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	4.03	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.54	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	7.03	-4.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.15	26.75	-17.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATFV vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATFV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATFV and DARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATFV	DARP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	3.59	-1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	1.49	-0.90

Drawdowns

ATFV vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and DARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATFV	DARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.34%	-30.27%	-15.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.29%	-11.82%	-6.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	-0.76%	-1.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.81%	-4.64%	-13.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.33%	3.10%	+2.23%

Volatility

ATFV vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) at 7.07%. This indicates that ATFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATFV	DARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.65%	7.07%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.34%	17.49%	-0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.00%	23.16%	-0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.62%	26.11%	+0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.55%	26.11%	+0.44%

ATFV vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATFV vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than DARP's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	0.17%	0.20%	0.16%	0.01%	0.06%
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	0.33%	0.43%	1.93%	0.32%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATFV and DARP in my portfolio?

ATFV and DARP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATFV or DARP?

ATFV has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to DARP (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATFV dropped -45.34% vs DARP's -30.27%.

Which ETF is better, ATFV or DARP?

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 82.62% vs 48.62% for ATFV. On fees, ATFV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, DARP has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ATFV or DARP?

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 82.62% return vs 48.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATFV or DARP?

ATFV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATFV or DARP?

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.17% for ATFV.

What is the main difference between ATFV and DARP?

They also come from different issuers: Alger Group Holdings LLC and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ATFV and 0.75% for DARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.