MERC vs. PG
MERC (Mercer International Inc.) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. MERC operates in Paper & Paper Products (Basic Materials), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MERC returned -19.21%/yr vs 8.30%/yr for PG. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MERC vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MERC achieves a -66.21% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MERC has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -19.21%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.30% annualized return.
MERC
- 1D
- 5.85%
- 1M
- -14.23%
- 6M
- -65.52%
- YTD
- -66.21%
- 1Y
- -77.85%
- 3Y*
- -56.96%
- 5Y*
- -41.84%
- 10Y*
- -19.21%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.80%
PG
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- 6M
- -3.94%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- -0.94%
- 3Y*
- 0.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $237.81K | $403.25K | $475.85K | |
| $1.28B | $1.27B | $1.30B |
MERC vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MERC Mercer International Inc. | -66.21% | -68.51% | -28.65% | -15.71% | -0.59% | 19.46% | -12.81% | 22.62% | -24.32% | 39.65% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.41% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between MERC and PG is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
MERC:
$44.81M
PG:
$344.65B
MERC:
-$11.82
PG:
$6.62
MERC:
0.02
PG:
4.04
MERC:
$1.85B
PG:
$87.03B
MERC:
-$64.63M
PG:
$43.67B
MERC:
-$73.03M
PG:
$21.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MERC vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
MERC
PG
MERC vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer International Inc. (MERC) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MERC | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.01 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.06 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -0.10 | -1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MERC vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MERC drawdown since its inception was -99.05%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MERC and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MERC | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.05% | -54.25% | -44.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.55% | -15.52% | -68.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.64% | -21.15% | -73.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.43% | -23.77% | -72.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.43% | -23.77% | -72.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.54% | -15.35% | -81.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.31% | -12.17% | -49.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.78% | 9.09% | +42.69% |
Volatility
MERC vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Mercer International Inc. (MERC) has a higher volatility of 30.78% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.36%. This indicates that MERC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MERC | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.78% | 6.36% | +24.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.44% | 15.67% | +46.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.22% | 19.61% | +58.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.78% | 18.07% | +36.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.62% | 19.18% | +30.44% |
Dividends
MERC vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
MERC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MERC Mercer International Inc. | 0.00% | 7.58% | 4.62% | 3.16% | 2.58% | 2.17% | 3.24% | 4.37% | 4.79% | 3.29% | 4.32% | 2.54% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.96% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
MERC vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mercer International Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MERC vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
MERC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mercer International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 489.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.28B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
MERC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mercer International Inc. reported an operating income of -32.89M and revenue of 489.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.7%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 3.95B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
MERC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mercer International Inc. reported a net income of -52.00M and revenue of 489.30M, resulting in a net margin of -10.6%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MERC and PG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MERC has higher volatility (30.78%) compared to PG (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MERC dropped -99.05% vs PG's -54.25%.
PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MERC and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer