PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MERC vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MERC vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mercer International Inc. (MERC) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MERC achieves a -63.32% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 6.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MERC has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -18.35%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.


MERC

1D
-6.04%
1M
-30.17%
YTD
-63.32%
6M
-65.25%
1Y
-78.80%
3Y*
-53.70%
5Y*
-41.95%
10Y*
-18.35%

PG

1D
2.15%
1M
4.44%
YTD
6.81%
6M
6.91%
1Y
-3.62%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MERC vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MERC
Mercer International Inc.
-63.32%-68.51%-28.65%-15.71%-0.59%19.46%-12.81%22.62%-24.32%39.65%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
6.81%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MERC and PG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.11

Fundamentals

EPS

MERC:

-$10.51

PG:

$5.23

PS Ratio

MERC:

0.02

PG:

4.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

MERC:

$1.85B

PG:

$86.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MERC:

-$64.63M

PG:

$43.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

MERC:

-$73.03M

PG:

$22.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MERC vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MERC
MERC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MERC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MERC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MERC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MERC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MERC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MERC vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer International Inc. (MERC) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MERCPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.98

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

-0.23

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

-0.43

-1.02

MERC vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MERC Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MERC and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MERC vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MERC drawdown since its inception was -99.05%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MERC and PG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MERCPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.05%

-54.25%

-44.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.34%

-15.52%

-67.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.89%

-21.15%

-71.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.26%

-23.77%

-71.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.26%

-23.77%

-71.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.25%

-12.57%

-83.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.20%

-12.16%

-49.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.53%

8.48%

+46.05%

Volatility

MERC vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Mercer International Inc. (MERC) has a higher volatility of 24.45% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.62%. This indicates that MERC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MERCPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.45%

7.62%

+16.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.24%

15.05%

+41.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.71%

18.92%

+56.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.66%

17.86%

+34.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.42%

19.08%

+29.34%

Dividends

MERC vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

MERC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.33%, more than PG's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MERC
Mercer International Inc.
10.33%7.58%4.62%3.16%2.58%2.17%3.24%4.37%4.79%3.29%4.32%2.54%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.82%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%

Financials

MERC vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mercer International Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
489.30M
21.24B
(MERC) Total Revenue
(PG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MERC vs. PG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mercer International Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
49.5%
Portfolio components
MERC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercer International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 489.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

MERC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercer International Inc. reported an operating income of -32.89M and revenue of 489.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.7%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

MERC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercer International Inc. reported a net income of -52.00M and revenue of 489.30M, resulting in a net margin of -10.6%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MERC and PG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MERC has higher volatility (24.45%) compared to PG (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MERC dropped -99.05% vs PG's -54.25%.

PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MERC and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer