PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATD.TO vs. ZQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATD.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATD.TO achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than ZQQ.TO's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO has underperformed ZQQ.TO with an annualized return of 11.33%, while ZQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.08% annualized return.


ATD.TO

1D
1.04%
1M
0.48%
YTD
7.06%
6M
9.62%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
6.79%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
11.33%

ZQQ.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
10.63%
YTD
19.82%
6M
18.08%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
20.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATD.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATD.TO
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
7.06%-4.91%3.11%32.26%13.21%22.84%5.88%22.54%3.57%6.48%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
19.82%18.38%24.00%52.52%-33.75%26.68%45.33%37.08%-2.29%31.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ATD.TO and ZQQ.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010

0.23

The correlation between ATD.TO and ZQQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATD.TO vs. ZQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATD.TO
ATD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ATD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATD.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATD.TOZQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.43

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

3.01

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

11.25

-9.36

ATD.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATD.TO and ZQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATD.TOZQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.46

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.72

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.90

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.91

-0.23

Drawdowns

ATD.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATD.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than ZQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATD.TO and ZQQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATD.TOZQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-36.39%

-27.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-12.86%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

-22.79%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

-36.39%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.61%

-36.39%

+3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-0.28%

-5.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-5.37%

-6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

3.43%

+2.60%

Volatility

ATD.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) at 4.54%. This indicates that ATD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATD.TOZQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

4.54%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.98%

12.02%

+5.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.67%

15.73%

+9.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

22.57%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.54%

22.41%

+2.13%

Dividends

ATD.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ATD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than ZQQ.TO's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATD.TO
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
1.02%1.07%0.90%0.76%0.79%0.71%0.69%0.61%0.57%0.55%0.50%0.27%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
0.22%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATD.TO and ZQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATD.TO and ZQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer