ATD.TO vs. CTRA
Compare and contrast key facts about Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATD.TO or CTRA.
Key characteristics
| ATD.TO | CTRA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.61% | 12.29% |
| 1Y Return | 17.07% | 18.71% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 24.10% | 28.12% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.31% | 6.20% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 17.83% | -0.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.88 | 0.68 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.45% | 24.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -100.00% | -74.42% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.99% | -12.94% |
Fundamentals
| ATD.TO | CTRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$73.15B | $20.85B |
| EPS | CA$4.18 | $2.13 |
| PE Ratio | 18.20 | 13.03 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$67.94B | $5.68B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$11.00B | $7.64B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$5.22B | $3.80B |
Correlation
The correlation between ATD.TO and CTRA is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ATD.TO achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than CTRA's 12.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO has outperformed CTRA with an annualized return of 17.83%, while CTRA has yielded a comparatively lower -0.51% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Dividend Comparison
ATD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than CTRA's 2.85% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.69% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. | 2.85% | 4.58% | 10.13% | 5.89% | 2.46% | 1.87% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.31% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.14% |
Drawdowns
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CTRA's maximum drawdown of -74.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATD.TO and CTRA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Volatility Comparison
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) at 4.12%. This indicates that ATD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. and Coterra Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities