ATD.TO vs. CTRA
Compare and contrast key facts about Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATD.TO or CTRA.
Correlation
The correlation between ATD.TO and CTRA is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ATD.TO:
-0.32
CTRA:
-0.38
ATD.TO:
-0.24
CTRA:
-0.32
ATD.TO:
0.97
CTRA:
0.96
ATD.TO:
-0.06
CTRA:
-0.38
ATD.TO:
-0.57
CTRA:
-0.99
ATD.TO:
10.76%
CTRA:
11.35%
ATD.TO:
22.88%
CTRA:
29.90%
ATD.TO:
-100.00%
CTRA:
-74.41%
ATD.TO:
-99.99%
CTRA:
-23.66%
Fundamentals
ATD.TO:
CA$65.90B
CTRA:
$18.42B
ATD.TO:
CA$3.76
CTRA:
$1.71
ATD.TO:
18.49
CTRA:
14.11
ATD.TO:
0.89
CTRA:
3.17
ATD.TO:
3.41
CTRA:
1.21
ATD.TO:
CA$56.59B
CTRA:
$5.03B
ATD.TO:
CA$10.09B
CTRA:
$2.06B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATD.TO achieves a -12.56% return, which is significantly lower than CTRA's -4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO has outperformed CTRA with an annualized return of 11.71%, while CTRA has yielded a comparatively lower -0.89% annualized return.
ATD.TO
-12.56%
-1.97%
-9.00%
-7.27%
12.35%
11.71%
CTRA
-4.75%
-4.09%
-3.47%
-11.22%
10.45%
-0.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATD.TO vs. CTRA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ATD.TO
CTRA
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Dividend Comparison
ATD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than CTRA's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 1.06% | 0.90% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. | 3.52% | 3.29% | 4.58% | 10.13% | 5.89% | 2.46% | 2.01% | 1.12% | 0.59% | 0.34% | 0.45% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CTRA's maximum drawdown of -74.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATD.TO and CTRA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) is 6.54%, while Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) has a volatility of 13.30%. This indicates that ATD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. and Coterra Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATD.TO vs. CTRA - Profitability Comparison
ATD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.76B and revenue of 20.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.
CTRA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 642.00M and revenue of 924.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.5%.
ATD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 972.00M and revenue of 20.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
CTRA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Coterra Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 702.00M and revenue of 924.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 76.0%.
ATD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 641.40M and revenue of 20.90B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
CTRA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a net income of 516.00M and revenue of 924.00M, resulting in a net margin of 55.8%.