ATD.TO vs. QQC-F.TO
ATD.TO (Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.) is a stock, while QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO returned 13.23%/yr vs 19.59%/yr for QQC-F.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATD.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATD.TO achieves a 23.05% return, which is significantly higher than QQC-F.TO's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO has underperformed QQC-F.TO with an annualized return of 13.23%, while QQC-F.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.59% annualized return.
ATD.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 22.64%
- YTD
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 35.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
QQC-F.TO
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.59%
ATD.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 23.05% | -4.91% | 3.11% | 32.26% | 13.21% | 22.84% | 5.88% | 23.08% | 4.21% | 7.08% |
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 14.50% | 18.79% | 24.19% | 52.81% | -33.42% | 27.15% | 45.04% | 37.63% | -2.23% | 31.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATD.TO and QQC-F.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | 0.24 |
The correlation between ATD.TO and QQC-F.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATD.TO vs. QQC-F.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ATD.TO
QQC-F.TO
ATD.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATD.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 2.03 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 7.11 | -0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATD.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATD.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.10%, which is greater than QQC-F.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATD.TO and QQC-F.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATD.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.10% | -36.03% | -25.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -12.98% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -22.76% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -36.03% | +13.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.61% | -36.03% | +3.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -4.73% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -5.48% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 3.70% | +2.05% |
Volatility
ATD.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Volatility Comparison
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.31% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) at 8.01%. This indicates that ATD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQC-F.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATD.TO | QQC-F.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.31% | 8.01% | +4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.26% | 15.16% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.10% | 18.46% | +9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 22.84% | +1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 22.68% | +2.06% |
Dividends
ATD.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Dividend Comparison
ATD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than QQC-F.TO's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.92% | 1.07% | 0.90% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.69% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 0.72% |
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.34% | 0.39% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.66% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATD.TO and QQC-F.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATD.TO and QQC-F.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer