PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
L.TO vs. SLF.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


L.TOSLF.TO
YTD Return46.31%24.83%
1Y Return55.27%32.01%
3Y Return (Ann)25.67%10.38%
5Y Return (Ann)23.35%10.89%
10Y Return (Ann)15.47%11.60%
Sharpe Ratio3.472.15
Sortino Ratio4.472.88
Omega Ratio1.611.43
Calmar Ratio6.762.69
Martin Ratio30.046.90
Ulcer Index1.88%4.71%
Daily Std Dev16.34%15.14%
Max Drawdown-65.60%-71.53%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Fundamentals


L.TOSLF.TO
Market CapCA$56.80BCA$47.83B
EPSCA$6.60CA$6.12
PE Ratio28.1813.56
PEG Ratio3.151.26
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$42.06BCA$49.97B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$13.75BCA$34.79B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$4.72BCA$589.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between L.TO and SLF.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

L.TO vs. SLF.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 46.31% return, which is significantly higher than SLF.TO's 24.83% return. Over the past 10 years, L.TO has outperformed SLF.TO with an annualized return of 15.47%, while SLF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.60% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.77%
20.04%
L.TO
SLF.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

L.TO vs. SLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


L.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for L.TO, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for L.TO, currently valued at 4.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for L.TO, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for L.TO, currently valued at 6.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for L.TO, currently valued at 25.27, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0025.27
SLF.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 5.72, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.72

L.TO vs. SLF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is higher than the SLF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L.TO and SLF.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.21
1.87
L.TO
SLF.TO

Dividends

L.TO vs. SLF.TO - Dividend Comparison

L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SLF.TO's 3.83% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
1.03%1.37%1.34%1.37%2.07%1.86%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLF.TO
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.83%4.37%4.39%3.28%3.89%3.55%4.21%3.36%3.14%3.50%3.44%3.84%

Drawdowns

L.TO vs. SLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, smaller than the maximum SLF.TO drawdown of -71.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and SLF.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.36%
-0.05%
L.TO
SLF.TO

Volatility

L.TO vs. SLF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.13%
5.17%
L.TO
SLF.TO

Financials

L.TO vs. SLF.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loblaw Companies Limited and Sun Life Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items