AT.L vs. CSU.TO
AT.L (Ashtead Technology Holdings plc) and CSU.TO (Constellation Software Inc.) are both stocks. AT.L operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while CSU.TO operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, AT.L returned 5.46%/yr vs -1.80%/yr for CSU.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AT.L vs. CSU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AT.L is traded in GBp, while CSU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CSU.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AT.L achieves a 41.36% return, which is significantly higher than CSU.TO's -12.87% return.
AT.L
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -9.15%
- YTD
- 41.36%
- 6M
- 24.84%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSU.TO
- 1D
- 5.37%
- 1M
- 20.02%
- YTD
- -12.87%
- 6M
- -13.81%
- 1Y
- -41.00%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 20.10%
AT.L vs. CSU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT.L Ashtead Technology Holdings plc | 41.36% | -44.41% | -8.83% | 95.43% | 75.24% | 10.96% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | -12.87% | -27.62% | 26.96% | 54.42% | -5.71% | 6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between AT.L and CSU.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2021 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
AT.L:
£356.14M
CSU.TO:
CA$61.49B
AT.L:
£0.75
CSU.TO:
CA$34.85
AT.L:
5.83
CSU.TO:
83.25
AT.L:
0.05
CSU.TO:
4.37
AT.L:
0.96
CSU.TO:
5.06
AT.L:
2.27
CSU.TO:
15.82
AT.L:
£371.24M
CSU.TO:
CA$12.15B
AT.L:
£174.19M
CSU.TO:
CA$5.28B
AT.L:
£148.23M
CSU.TO:
CA$3.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AT.L vs. CSU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AT.L
CSU.TO
AT.L vs. CSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashtead Technology Holdings plc (AT.L) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AT.L | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.83 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | -0.76 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | -1.18 | +1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AT.L | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | -1.02 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.14 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
AT.L vs. CSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AT.L drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, which is greater than CSU.TO's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AT.L and CSU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AT.L | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.60% | -56.49% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.05% | -55.29% | +20.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.60% | -56.49% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.08% | -44.55% | -5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.01% | -6.50% | -16.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.67% | 35.66% | -14.99% |
Volatility
AT.L vs. CSU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ashtead Technology Holdings plc (AT.L) is 13.79%, while Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a volatility of 15.52%. This indicates that AT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AT.L | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.79% | 15.52% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.29% | 33.43% | -2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.07% | 41.20% | +7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.95% | 28.85% | +15.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.95% | 28.45% | +15.50% |
Dividends
AT.L vs. CSU.TO - Dividend Comparison
AT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, more than CSU.TO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT.L Ashtead Technology Holdings plc | 0.30% | 0.39% | 0.20% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.30% | 2.53% | 0.60% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 0.90% |
Financials
AT.L vs. CSU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashtead Technology Holdings plc and Constellation Software Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AT.L vs. CSU.TO - Profitability Comparison
AT.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ashtead Technology Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 36.24M and revenue of 104.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
CSU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a gross profit of 731.81M and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
AT.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ashtead Technology Holdings plc reported an operating income of 29.83M and revenue of 104.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.7%.
CSU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported an operating income of 451.48M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
AT.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ashtead Technology Holdings plc reported a net income of 18.35M and revenue of 104.06M, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.
CSU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a net income of 360.99M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AT.L and CSU.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AT.L and CSU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer