PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASST vs. ATH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASST vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ASST is traded in USD, while ATH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASST achieves a -21.27% return, which is significantly lower than ATH.TO's 39.89% return.


ASST

1D
2.47%
1M
-34.24%
YTD
-21.27%
6M
-24.88%
1Y
-85.14%
3Y*
-59.43%
5Y*
10Y*

ATH.TO

1D
0.17%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
39.89%
6M
40.02%
1Y
74.64%
3Y*
49.11%
5Y*
55.47%
10Y*
20.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASST vs. ATH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ASST
Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock
-21.27%50.46%-84.65%-89.13%
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
39.89%38.20%17.84%51.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ASST and ATH.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASST:

$716.14M

ATH.TO:

CA$4.95B

EPS

ASST:

-$19.16

ATH.TO:

CA$0.45

PS Ratio

ASST:

72.97

ATH.TO:

3.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASST:

$5.73M

ATH.TO:

CA$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASST:

-$7.43M

ATH.TO:

CA$518.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

ASST:

-$304.63M

ATH.TO:

CA$505.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASST vs. ATH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASST
ASST Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ASST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASST Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ASST Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASST Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ATH.TO
ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASST vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASSTATH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.32

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

3.24

-4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

10.81

-11.87

ASST vs. ATH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASST Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASST and ATH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASST vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASST drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, roughly equal to the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASST and ATH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASSTATH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.78%

-99.59%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.98%

-23.14%

-72.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.25%

-29.96%

-67.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.02%

-62.47%

-35.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.48%

-76.83%

-13.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

80.34%

6.93%

+73.41%

Volatility

ASST vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) has a higher volatility of 25.82% compared to Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) at 13.05%. This indicates that ASST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASSTATH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.82%

13.05%

+12.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

81.19%

31.88%

+49.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

162.89%

37.71%

+125.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

320.82%

49.97%

+270.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

320.82%

61.94%

+258.88%

Dividends

ASST vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASST nor ATH.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ASST vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.76M
377.38M
(ASST) Total Revenue
(ATH.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ASST values in USD, ATH.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


ASST and ATH.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASST and ATH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer