PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASQIX vs. NINLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASQIX vs. NINLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) and Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASQIX achieves a 20.09% return, which is significantly lower than NINLX's 24.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ASQIX has underperformed NINLX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while NINLX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


ASQIX

1D
0.76%
1M
5.38%
YTD
20.09%
6M
20.98%
1Y
39.89%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
9.67%

NINLX

1D
2.00%
1M
7.71%
YTD
24.97%
6M
25.69%
1Y
58.43%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASQIX vs. NINLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASQIX
American Century Small Company Fund
20.09%12.93%4.44%21.29%-21.34%21.65%16.42%19.71%-14.39%10.58%
NINLX
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund
24.97%18.20%7.62%13.89%-20.22%26.42%27.14%24.92%-10.56%16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ASQIX and NINLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

0.93

The correlation between ASQIX and NINLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASQIX vs. NINLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASQIX
ASQIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ASQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ASQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NINLX
NINLX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NINLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NINLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASQIX vs. NINLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) and Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASQIXNINLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

3.05

-0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

3.90

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.49

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

6.62

-1.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.99

23.91

-8.91

ASQIX vs. NINLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASQIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the NINLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASQIX and NINLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASQIXNINLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

3.05

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.37

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.55

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.48

-0.10

Drawdowns

ASQIX vs. NINLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASQIX drawdown since its inception was -63.58%, which is greater than NINLX's maximum drawdown of -59.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASQIX and NINLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASQIXNINLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.58%

-59.95%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-9.39%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.78%

-26.46%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-28.71%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.59%

-44.43%

-1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-9.90%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.59%

+0.20%

Volatility

ASQIX vs. NINLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) is 5.32%, while Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that ASQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NINLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASQIXNINLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

5.64%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

14.56%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

20.36%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

21.79%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.53%

23.10%

-0.57%

ASQIX vs. NINLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASQIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NINLX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASQIX vs. NINLX - Dividend Comparison

ASQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than NINLX's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASQIX
American Century Small Company Fund
2.07%2.57%0.30%0.49%0.55%18.62%0.51%0.34%13.12%5.19%0.37%0.31%
NINLX
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund
3.40%4.25%0.92%0.25%3.76%6.40%1.62%2.85%14.51%5.19%1.42%5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ASQIX and NINLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NINLX has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to ASQIX (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASQIX dropped -63.58% vs NINLX's -59.95%.

NINLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASQIX and NINLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer