PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASQIX vs. CSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASQIX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASQIX achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than CSMDX's 13.17% return.


ASQIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.83%
6M
14.04%
YTD
20.65%
1Y
36.01%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
9.43%
ALL TIME*
8.58%

CSMDX

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.75%
6M
6.67%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ASQIX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASQIX
American Century Small Company Fund
20.65%12.93%4.44%21.29%-21.34%21.65%16.42%19.71%-14.39%8.22%
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
13.17%2.72%2.24%18.89%-14.89%22.60%8.29%29.90%-5.20%10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ASQIX and CSMDX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2017

0.92

The correlation between ASQIX and CSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASQIX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASQIX
ASQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ASQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ASQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CSMDX
CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASQIX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASQIXCSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

1.72

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.54

5.33

+6.21

ASQIX vs. CSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASQIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the CSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASQIX and CSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASQIX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASQIX drawdown since its inception was -63.58%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASQIX and CSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASQIXCSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.58%

-37.28%

-26.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-9.20%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.78%

-24.60%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-24.60%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-1.31%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-5.69%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.97%

-0.06%

Volatility

ASQIX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 3.31%. This indicates that ASQIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASQIXCSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

3.31%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

10.17%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.07%

14.39%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

18.12%

+3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

19.07%

+3.43%

ASQIX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASQIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASQIX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison

ASQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than CSMDX's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASQIX
American Century Small Company Fund
2.00%2.57%0.30%0.49%0.55%18.62%0.51%0.34%13.12%5.19%0.37%0.31%
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
2.77%3.14%1.33%0.81%4.07%6.67%0.38%2.61%4.40%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASQIX and CSMDX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASQIX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to CSMDX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASQIX dropped -63.58% vs CSMDX's -37.28%.

ASQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASQIX and CSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer