PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMU vs. SDCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMU vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASMU

1D
8.49%
1M
21.60%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SDCI

1D
1.53%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
20.11%
6M
17.81%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
20.44%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMU vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMU and SDCI is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMU vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMU vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMUSDCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

ASMU vs. SDCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASMU vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum SDCI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and SDCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMUSDCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-45.79%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.10%

-9.66%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.06%

-11.55%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

Volatility

ASMU vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMUSDCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.31%

16.76%

+87.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.31%

18.39%

+85.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.31%

17.06%

+87.25%

ASMU vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SDCI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMU vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison

ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than SDCI's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ASMU
Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF
0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
3.06%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASMU and SDCI have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDCI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDCI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.

SDCI has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.51% for ASMU.

ASMU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SDCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.60% for SDCI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMU and SDCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer