PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMNX vs. HSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMNX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N (ASMNX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASMNX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HSPGX

1D
-2.29%
1M
7.66%
YTD
31.71%
6M
26.85%
1Y
67.21%
3Y*
34.10%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
17.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMNX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASMNX
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N
17.21%16.62%16.62%18.09%-19.78%15.05%25.80%25.69%-12.36%17.21%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
31.71%31.62%28.04%18.66%-24.65%3.59%38.49%28.33%-12.16%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMNX and HSPGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.93

The correlation between ASMNX and HSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMNX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMNX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HSPGX
HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMNX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N (ASMNX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMNXHSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.67

ASMNX vs. HSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASMNX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMNXHSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

Volatility

ASMNX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMNXHSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.23%

ASMNX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMNX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than HSPGX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMNX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison

ASMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, less than HSPGX's 9.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASMNX
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N
7.75%8.05%19.09%3.54%0.27%24.51%5.45%3.83%29.34%9.61%0.00%0.97%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
9.67%12.74%21.85%6.43%8.77%19.11%8.48%1.45%11.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASMNX and HSPGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMNX and HSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer