PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASML vs. 0P4F.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a 74.80% return, which is significantly higher than 0P4F.L's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML has outperformed 0P4F.L with an annualized return of 36.00%, while 0P4F.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.75% annualized return.


ASML

1D
-1.89%
1M
17.61%
YTD
74.80%
6M
73.02%
1Y
146.81%
3Y*
37.59%
5Y*
22.97%
10Y*
36.00%

0P4F.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.07%
YTD
12.22%
6M
7.84%
1Y
45.02%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
6.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
74.80%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%93.56%-9.80%56.23%
0P4F.L
Ford Motor Company
12.22%42.85%-16.71%11.98%-42.26%132.07%-2.95%28.68%-34.54%5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ASML and 0P4F.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2013

0.18

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASML vs. 0P4F.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

0P4F.L
0P4F.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
0P4F.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0P4F.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
0P4F.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
0P4F.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
0P4F.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASML0P4F.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.83

2.02

+5.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.08

5.30

+15.77

ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASML Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is higher than the 0P4F.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASML and 0P4F.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than 0P4F.L's maximum drawdown of -66.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and 0P4F.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASML0P4F.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.00%

-66.41%

-23.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-22.11%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.38%

-38.17%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.84%

-61.38%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.84%

-62.91%

+6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-31.24%

+29.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.12%

-28.79%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

8.44%

-1.81%

Volatility

ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 17.27%, while Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L) has a volatility of 20.08%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0P4F.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASML0P4F.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.27%

20.08%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.58%

29.46%

+5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.75%

37.63%

+5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.44%

37.55%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.72%

44.11%

-5.39%

Dividends

ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Dividend Comparison

ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than 0P4F.L's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0P4F.L
Ford Motor Company
4.15%5.68%4.53%3.64%4.37%0.49%1.69%6.47%9.49%5.17%4.77%4.58%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.47%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%

Financials

ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
8.77B
(ASML) Total Revenue
(0P4F.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ASML values in EUR, 0P4F.L values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ASML and 0P4F.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASML and 0P4F.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer