ASML vs. 0P4F.L
ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) and 0P4F.L (Ford Motor Company) are both stocks. ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while 0P4F.L operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, ASML returned 36.00%/yr vs 6.75%/yr for 0P4F.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a 74.80% return, which is significantly higher than 0P4F.L's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML has outperformed 0P4F.L with an annualized return of 36.00%, while 0P4F.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.75% annualized return.
ASML
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 74.80%
- 6M
- 73.02%
- 1Y
- 146.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.97%
- 10Y*
- 36.00%
0P4F.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 12.22%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 45.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.75%
ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 74.80% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
0P4F.L Ford Motor Company | 12.22% | 42.85% | -16.71% | 11.98% | -42.26% | 132.07% | -2.95% | 28.68% | -34.54% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASML and 0P4F.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2013 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASML vs. 0P4F.L — Risk / Return Rank
ASML
0P4F.L
ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASML | 0P4F.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.24 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.83 | 2.02 | +5.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.08 | 5.30 | +15.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than 0P4F.L's maximum drawdown of -66.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and 0P4F.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASML | 0P4F.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -66.41% | -23.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -22.11% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.38% | -38.17% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.84% | -61.38% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.84% | -62.91% | +6.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -31.24% | +29.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.12% | -28.79% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 8.44% | -1.81% |
Volatility
ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 17.27%, while Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L) has a volatility of 20.08%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0P4F.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASML | 0P4F.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.27% | 20.08% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.58% | 29.46% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.75% | 37.63% | +5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.44% | 37.55% | +4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.72% | 44.11% | -5.39% |
Dividends
ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Dividend Comparison
ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than 0P4F.L's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0P4F.L Ford Motor Company | 4.15% | 5.68% | 4.53% | 3.64% | 4.37% | 0.49% | 1.69% | 6.47% | 9.49% | 5.17% | 4.77% | 4.58% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.47% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
Financials
ASML vs. 0P4F.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ASML and 0P4F.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ASML and 0P4F.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer