PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L) and Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0P4F.L is traded in USD, while 2899.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2899.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0P4F.L achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly higher than 2899.HK's -7.14% return. Over the past 10 years, 0P4F.L has underperformed 2899.HK with an annualized return of 5.82%, while 2899.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 33.95% annualized return.


0P4F.L

1D
-2.68%
1M
25.64%
YTD
15.77%
6M
16.15%
1Y
55.10%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
5.82%

2899.HK

1D
-2.62%
1M
-6.07%
YTD
-7.14%
6M
-0.25%
1Y
85.16%
3Y*
45.80%
5Y*
26.40%
10Y*
33.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0P4F.L
Ford Motor Company
15.77%40.49%-14.02%13.23%-42.26%132.07%-2.95%28.81%-32.29%-3.13%
2899.HK
Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H
-7.19%157.99%13.94%23.34%16.45%6.53%135.16%37.02%3.66%20.31%

Correlation

The correlation between 0P4F.L and 2899.HK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0P4F.L
0P4F.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
0P4F.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0P4F.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
0P4F.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
0P4F.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
0P4F.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

2899.HK
2899.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
2899.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2899.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
2899.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
2899.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
2899.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L) and Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0P4F.L2899.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.95

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

7.02

-0.47

0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0P4F.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the 2899.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0P4F.L and 2899.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0P4F.L2899.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.88

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.62

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.78

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.33

-0.16

Drawdowns

0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0P4F.L drawdown since its inception was -69.76%, smaller than the maximum 2899.HK drawdown of -89.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0P4F.L and 2899.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0P4F.L2899.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.76%

-89.63%

+19.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.45%

-29.86%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.84%

-29.86%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.35%

-46.97%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.77%

-49.47%

-14.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.18%

-28.02%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-44.90%

+10.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.29%

12.39%

-4.10%

Volatility

0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK - Volatility Comparison

Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L) has a higher volatility of 22.13% compared to Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK) at 14.51%. This indicates that 0P4F.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2899.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0P4F.L2899.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.13%

14.51%

+7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.75%

35.37%

-5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.41%

46.89%

-8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.62%

44.23%

-5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.34%

44.52%

-2.18%

Dividends

0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK - Dividend Comparison

0P4F.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than 2899.HK's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0P4F.L
Ford Motor Company
1.96%4.55%7.85%4.86%4.37%0.49%1.69%6.47%7.80%5.00%5.37%4.21%
2899.HK
Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H
0.72%1.53%2.33%2.18%2.20%1.56%1.25%2.93%3.74%2.33%2.83%5.00%

Financials

0P4F.L vs. 2899.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 0P4F.L values in USD, 2899.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


0P4F.L and 2899.HK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0P4F.L and 2899.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer