ASMH vs. TSXU
ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - ASMH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
ASMH vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 63.99% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
ASMH
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 25.24%
- YTD
- 63.99%
- 6M
- 53.18%
- 1Y
- 130.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMH vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 63.99% | 6.90% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMH and TSXU is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASMH vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
ASMH
TSXU
ASMH vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASMH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASMH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.59 | 4.53 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
ASMH vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -35.62% | +19.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.92% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -10.56% | +6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.14% | — | — |
Volatility
ASMH vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASMH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.94% | 78.68% | -39.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.32% | 78.68% | -40.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.32% | 78.68% | -40.36% |
ASMH vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASMH vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 0.99% | 0.19% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASMH and TSXU have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.99% for ASMH.
ASMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Precidian Funds and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ASMH and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for ASMH and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer