ASMG vs. VRTL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ASMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ASMG returned 284.81% vs 343.57% for VRTL. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.

Performance

ASMG vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMG achieves a 132.71% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 187.83% return.

ASMG

• 1D: -15.76%
• 1M: 13.68%
• YTD: 132.71%
• 6M: 134.72%
• 1Y: 284.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRTL

• 1D: -22.65%
• 1M: -11.35%
• YTD: 187.83%
• 6M: 172.02%
• 1Y: 343.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMG vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	132.71%	76.38%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	187.83%	110.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMG and VRTL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025	0.56

The correlation between ASMG and VRTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASMG vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMG

ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 86
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 91

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 83
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMG vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASMG	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.28	2.89	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.02	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.38	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.30	7.30	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.59	17.10	+3.49

ASMG vs. VRTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMG Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the VRTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMG and VRTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASMG vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMG drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum VRTL drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMG and VRTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMG	VRTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.95%	-60.58%	+16.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.56%	-47.45%	+12.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.94%	-33.92%	+17.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-15.93%	+3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.90%	20.20%	-6.30%

Volatility

ASMG vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) is 37.34%, while GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a volatility of 43.78%. This indicates that ASMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASMG	VRTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.34%	43.78%	-6.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.58%	92.17%	-21.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.62%	119.83%	-32.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	87.74%	126.87%	-39.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	87.74%	126.87%	-39.13%

ASMG vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMG vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	4.81%	11.20%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMG and VRTL in my portfolio?

ASMG and VRTL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASMG or VRTL?

VRTL has higher volatility (43.78%) compared to ASMG (37.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMG dropped -43.95% vs VRTL's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, ASMG or VRTL?

On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 343.57% vs 284.81% for ASMG. On fees, ASMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ASMG has been the lower-risk option at 37.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASMG or VRTL?

Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 343.57% return vs 284.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMG or VRTL?

ASMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMG or VRTL?

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

What is the main difference between ASMG and VRTL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ASMG and 1.50% for VRTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.