PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMG vs. SKF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASMG vs. SKF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASMG vs. SKF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
40.33%63.67%
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
21.68%-24.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMG achieves a 40.33% return, which is significantly higher than SKF's 21.68% return.


ASMG

1D
10.26%
1M
-19.89%
YTD
40.33%
6M
61.13%
1Y
199.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SKF

1D
-4.38%
1M
7.51%
YTD
21.68%
6M
18.48%
1Y
-1.58%
3Y*
-23.90%
5Y*
-17.65%
10Y*
-26.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASMG vs. SKF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SKF's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ASMG vs. SKF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SKF
SKF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKF Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMG vs. SKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASMGSKFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

-0.04

+2.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

0.23

+2.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.03

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.48

-0.11

+5.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.51

-0.15

+14.66

ASMG vs. SKF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the SKF Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMG and SKF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMGSKFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

-0.04

+2.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

-0.50

+1.72

Correlation

The correlation between ASMG and SKF is -0.36. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

ASMG vs. SKF - Dividend Comparison

ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than SKF's 3.89% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
7.98%11.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
3.89%5.61%7.94%3.93%0.03%0.00%0.11%1.29%0.06%

Drawdowns

ASMG vs. SKF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMG drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum SKF drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMG and SKF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMGSKFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.95%

-99.96%

+56.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

-39.47%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.85%

-99.95%

+72.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-89.16%

+75.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.05%

29.24%

-16.19%

Volatility

ASMG vs. SKF - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) has a higher volatility of 30.09% compared to ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) at 9.64%. This indicates that ASMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASMGSKFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.09%

9.64%

+20.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.83%

22.75%

+36.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.10%

38.69%

+44.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.32%

36.06%

+46.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.32%

40.94%

+41.38%