ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASIL.L (Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF) and HMCD.L (HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds tracking the MSCI China NR USD, from Amundi and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASIL.L returned 0.63%/yr vs 5.83%/yr for HMCD.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASIL.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HMCD.L.

Performance

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ASIL.L is traded in GBp, while HMCD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMCD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIL.L achieves a -6.20% return, which is significantly higher than HMCD.L's -6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIL.L has underperformed HMCD.L with an annualized return of 0.63%, while HMCD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.83% annualized return.

ASIL.L

• 1D: -2.60%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: -6.20%
• 6M: -8.10%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: 6.75%
• 5Y*: -5.81%
• 10Y*: 0.63%

HMCD.L

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -2.21%
• YTD: -6.82%
• 6M: -8.57%
• 1Y: 7.69%
• 3Y*: 7.49%
• 5Y*: -4.13%
• 10Y*: 5.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF	-6.20%	27.56%	14.40%	-17.94%	-16.69%	-22.70%	-4.32%	9.43%	-6.32%	15.81%
HMCD.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF	-6.82%	22.20%	20.76%	-15.94%	-13.31%	-21.35%	25.52%	16.97%	-14.14%	40.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIL.L and HMCD.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2012	0.92

The correlation between ASIL.L and HMCD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ASIL.L	HMCD.L
Consumer Cyclical	29.8%	26.5%
Communication Services	21.2%	18.8%
Financial Services	19.0%	19.1%
Technology	11.7%	9.5%
Healthcare	5.9%	5.3%
Industrials	4.4%	5.0%
Basic Materials	3.1%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.5%
Utilities	0.6%	1.7%
Energy	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIL.L

ASIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
ASIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
ASIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
ASIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ASIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ASIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

HMCD.L

HMCD.L Risk / Return Rank: 14
HMCD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
HMCD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
HMCD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
HMCD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HMCD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASIL.L	HMCD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.39	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	0.69	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.08	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	0.45	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.99	0.94	+0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the HMCD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIL.L and HMCD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASIL.L	HMCD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	0.39	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	-0.15	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.23	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.16	-0.16

Drawdowns

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIL.L drawdown since its inception was -59.17%, roughly equal to the maximum HMCD.L drawdown of -56.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIL.L and HMCD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASIL.L	HMCD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.17%	-56.56%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.73%	-16.93%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.68%	-24.84%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.45%	-49.36%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.17%	-56.56%	-2.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.74%	-32.66%	-4.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.72%	-20.52%	-4.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.01%	8.16%	+0.85%

Volatility

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCD.L) have volatilities of 8.03% and 7.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASIL.L	HMCD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.03%	7.69%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.30%	14.26%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.71%	19.58%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.76%	27.89%	+0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.11%	25.66%	-0.55%

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIL.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HMCD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASIL.L vs. HMCD.L - Dividend Comparison

ASIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HMCD.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF	2.15%	2.25%	2.20%	2.08%	1.95%	1.31%	0.86%	1.59%	1.46%	0.75%	2.07%	2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASIL.L and HMCD.L in my portfolio?

ASIL.L and HMCD.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASIL.L or HMCD.L?

On fees, HMCD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASIL.L or HMCD.L?

HMCD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASIL.L.

What is the main difference between ASIL.L and HMCD.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASIL.L and 0.30% for HMCD.L.