PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASIC vs. SHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASIC vs. SHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIC achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's -1.61% return.


ASIC

1D
-1.19%
1M
6.79%
YTD
-1.14%
6M
2.72%
1Y
-12.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHW

1D
0.13%
1M
6.01%
YTD
-1.61%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
-4.65%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIC vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ASIC
Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC
-1.14%-11.16%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
-1.61%-9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIC and SHW is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASIC:

$1.03B

SHW:

$78.72B

EPS

ASIC:

$1.95

SHW:

$10.42

PE Ratio

ASIC:

10.66

SHW:

30.45

PEG Ratio

ASIC:

0.05

SHW:

2.96

PS Ratio

ASIC:

2.06

SHW:

3.31

PB Ratio

ASIC:

1.64

SHW:

17.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASIC:

$470.18M

SHW:

$23.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASIC:

$257.61M

SHW:

$11.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

ASIC:

$120.37M

SHW:

$4.29B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASIC vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIC
ASIC Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ASIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIC Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SHW
SHW Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHW Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIC vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASICSHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.95

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

-0.47

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

-0.99

+0.20

ASIC vs. SHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIC Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is comparable to the SHW Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIC and SHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASIC vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIC drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, smaller than the maximum SHW drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIC and SHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASICSHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-52.02%

+18.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.77%

-21.36%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.84%

-19.53%

+3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

-11.63%

-7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.98%

10.28%

+7.70%

Volatility

ASIC vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison

Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) at 9.00%. This indicates that ASIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASICSHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

9.00%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.68%

19.26%

+14.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.68%

25.46%

+22.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.79%

26.27%

+21.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.79%

26.58%

+21.21%

Dividends

ASIC vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison

ASIC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASIC
Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
1.00%0.98%0.84%0.78%1.01%0.62%0.73%0.77%0.87%0.83%1.25%1.03%

Financials

ASIC vs. SHW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC and The Sherwin-Williams Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
128.96M
5.67B
(ASIC) Total Revenue
(SHW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ASIC vs. SHW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC and The Sherwin-Williams Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
52.0%
49.1%
Portfolio components
ASIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a gross profit of 67.08M and revenue of 128.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

SHW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

ASIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported an operating income of 34.23M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.

SHW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

ASIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a net income of 25.47M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.

SHW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASIC and SHW have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASIC has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to SHW (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIC dropped -33.63% vs SHW's -52.02%.

ASIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASIC and SHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer