PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASIC vs. IESC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASIC vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIC achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 92.75% return.


ASIC

1D
-1.19%
1M
6.79%
YTD
-1.14%
6M
2.72%
1Y
-12.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IESC

1D
2.53%
1M
9.91%
YTD
92.75%
6M
62.95%
1Y
186.31%
3Y*
139.60%
5Y*
70.53%
10Y*
48.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIC vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ASIC
Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC
-1.14%-11.16%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
92.75%44.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIC and IESC is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASIC:

$1.03B

IESC:

$15.14B

EPS

ASIC:

$1.95

IESC:

$18.85

PE Ratio

ASIC:

10.66

IESC:

39.78

PEG Ratio

ASIC:

0.05

IESC:

0.48

PS Ratio

ASIC:

2.06

IESC:

4.17

PB Ratio

ASIC:

1.64

IESC:

14.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASIC:

$470.18M

IESC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASIC:

$257.61M

IESC:

$931.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

ASIC:

$120.37M

IESC:

$487.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASIC vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIC
ASIC Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ASIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIC Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIC vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASICIESCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.40

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

8.09

-8.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

22.98

-23.77

ASIC vs. IESC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIC Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIC and IESC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASIC vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIC drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIC and IESC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASICIESCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-98.32%

+64.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.77%

-21.80%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.84%

0.00%

-15.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

-54.97%

+35.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.98%

7.66%

+10.32%

Volatility

ASIC vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is 9.65%, while IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a volatility of 15.69%. This indicates that ASIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASICIESCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

15.69%

-6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.68%

50.65%

-16.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.68%

62.74%

-15.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.79%

54.09%

-6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.79%

48.19%

-0.40%

Dividends

ASIC vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASIC nor IESC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ASIC vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
128.96M
974.20M
(ASIC) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ASIC vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC and IES Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
52.0%
24.5%
Portfolio components
ASIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a gross profit of 67.08M and revenue of 128.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

ASIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported an operating income of 34.23M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

ASIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a net income of 25.47M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASIC and IESC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IESC has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to ASIC (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIC dropped -33.63% vs IESC's -98.32%.

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASIC and IESC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer