PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASIAX vs. MSAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASIAX vs. MSAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ASIAX having a 18.54% return and MSAQX slightly higher at 18.67%. Over the past 10 years, ASIAX has underperformed MSAQX with an annualized return of 8.79%, while MSAQX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return.


ASIAX

1D
3.34%
1M
10.09%
YTD
18.54%
6M
21.24%
1Y
41.40%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
8.79%

MSAQX

1D
3.32%
1M
13.70%
YTD
18.67%
6M
14.61%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
-4.06%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIAX vs. MSAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASIAX
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund
18.54%24.56%9.59%0.87%-10.82%-6.10%25.76%17.78%-11.50%29.13%
MSAQX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio
18.67%2.06%19.71%-6.83%-22.01%-20.52%52.55%44.74%-13.64%76.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIAX and MSAQX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.83

The correlation between ASIAX and MSAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASIAX vs. MSAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIAX
ASIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ASIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MSAQX
MSAQX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MSAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIAX vs. MSAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASIAXMSAQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

0.75

+2.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.67

1.15

+2.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.15

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

0.66

+2.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.96

1.71

+12.24

ASIAX vs. MSAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the MSAQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIAX and MSAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASIAXMSAQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

0.75

+2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

-0.17

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.48

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.48

+0.01

Drawdowns

ASIAX vs. MSAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIAX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, roughly equal to the maximum MSAQX drawdown of -61.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIAX and MSAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASIAXMSAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.78%

-61.11%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-23.57%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.36%

-23.57%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.71%

-53.29%

+21.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.32%

-61.11%

+24.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-31.65%

+31.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.10%

-24.42%

+9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

9.13%

-6.14%

Volatility

ASIAX vs. MSAQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) is 6.14%, while Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that ASIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASIAXMSAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

9.26%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.63%

18.80%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

21.62%

-5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

24.53%

-9.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

22.37%

-7.14%

ASIAX vs. MSAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MSAQX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASIAX vs. MSAQX - Dividend Comparison

ASIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.07%, while MSAQX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASIAX
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund
18.07%21.41%8.68%2.84%7.25%7.71%7.37%5.67%7.17%7.91%1.09%3.15%
MSAQX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%1.82%0.26%0.00%0.88%1.06%0.05%0.69%1.12%2.24%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASIAX and MSAQX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSAQX has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to ASIAX (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIAX dropped -63.78% vs MSAQX's -61.11%.

ASIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASIAX and MSAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer