PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSAQX vs. MINDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSAQX vs. MINDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSAQX achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than MINDX's -12.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MSAQX has outperformed MINDX with an annualized return of 10.88%, while MINDX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.


MSAQX

1D
1.28%
1M
13.16%
YTD
20.18%
6M
16.23%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
-3.56%
10Y*
10.88%

MINDX

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-12.84%
6M
-12.27%
1Y
-9.91%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
5.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSAQX vs. MINDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSAQX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio
20.18%2.06%19.71%-6.83%-22.01%-20.52%52.55%44.74%-13.64%76.83%
MINDX
Matthews India Fund
-12.84%1.61%9.99%23.14%-9.87%17.87%16.46%-0.79%-9.80%33.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MSAQX and MINDX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSAQX vs. MINDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSAQX
MSAQX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MSAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MSAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

MINDX
MINDX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSAQX vs. MINDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSAQXMINDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.89

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

-0.50

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

-1.27

+3.12

MSAQX vs. MINDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSAQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the MINDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSAQX and MINDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSAQXMINDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

-0.70

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.19

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.32

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Drawdowns

MSAQX vs. MINDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSAQX drawdown since its inception was -61.11%, smaller than the maximum MINDX drawdown of -72.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAQX and MINDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSAQXMINDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.11%

-72.18%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.57%

-21.96%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.57%

-26.51%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.29%

-26.51%

-26.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.11%

-48.46%

-12.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.78%

-20.40%

-10.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-14.95%

-9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.13%

8.53%

+0.60%

Volatility

MSAQX vs. MINDX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Matthews India Fund (MINDX) at 5.24%. This indicates that MSAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSAQXMINDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

5.24%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.83%

13.09%

+5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.61%

15.73%

+5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.54%

15.90%

+8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

17.43%

+4.95%

MSAQX vs. MINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSAQX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MINDX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSAQX vs. MINDX - Dividend Comparison

MSAQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINDX
Matthews India Fund
7.76%6.76%15.03%3.07%15.30%9.87%3.03%12.04%16.50%0.00%0.00%0.99%
MSAQX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%1.82%0.26%0.00%0.88%1.06%0.05%0.69%1.12%2.24%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSAQX and MINDX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSAQX has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to MINDX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSAQX dropped -61.11% vs MINDX's -72.18%.

MSAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSAQX and MINDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer