MSAQX vs. MINDX
MSAQX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio) and MINDX (Matthews India Fund) are both mutual funds - MSAQX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Morgan Stanley, while MINDX is a India Equities fund managed by Matthews. Over the past 10 years, MSAQX returned 9.57%/yr vs 5.69%/yr for MINDX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSAQX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for MINDX.
Performance
MSAQX vs. MINDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSAQX achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than MINDX's -8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MSAQX has outperformed MINDX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while MINDX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.69% annualized return.
MSAQX
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- -3.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
MINDX
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- 6M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 1Y
- -7.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
MSAQX vs. MINDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSAQX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio | 11.13% | 2.06% | 19.71% | -6.83% | -22.01% | -20.52% | 52.55% | 44.74% | -13.64% | 76.83% |
MINDX Matthews India Fund | -8.35% | 1.61% | 9.99% | 23.14% | -9.87% | 17.87% | 16.46% | -0.79% | -9.80% | 33.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSAQX and MINDX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSAQX vs. MINDX — Risk / Return Rank
MSAQX
MINDX
MSAQX vs. MINDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSAQX | MINDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.93 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | -0.33 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | -0.76 | +1.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSAQX vs. MINDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSAQX drawdown since its inception was -61.11%, smaller than the maximum MINDX drawdown of -72.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAQX and MINDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSAQX | MINDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.11% | -72.18% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.57% | -21.96% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.57% | -26.51% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.31% | -26.51% | -22.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.11% | -48.46% | -12.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.00% | -16.30% | -19.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.51% | -14.96% | -9.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.30% | 9.48% | -0.18% |
Volatility
MSAQX vs. MINDX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to Matthews India Fund (MINDX) at 4.85%. This indicates that MSAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSAQX | MINDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 4.85% | +4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.42% | 13.66% | +7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.27% | 16.10% | +8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 16.04% | +8.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 17.48% | +5.16% |
MSAQX vs. MINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSAQX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MINDX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSAQX vs. MINDX - Dividend Comparison
MSAQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINDX Matthews India Fund | 7.38% | 6.76% | 15.03% | 3.07% | 15.30% | 9.87% | 3.03% | 12.04% | 16.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.99% |
MSAQX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.82% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 1.06% | 0.05% | 0.69% | 1.12% | 2.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSAQX and MINDX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSAQX has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to MINDX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSAQX dropped -61.11% vs MINDX's -72.18%.
MSAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSAQX and MINDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer