ASIAX vs. IASMX
ASIAX (Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund) and IASMX (Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ASIAX returned 7.91%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for IASMX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASIAX charges 1.45%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for IASMX.
Performance
ASIAX vs. IASMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ASIAX having a 13.12% return and IASMX slightly higher at 13.47%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ASIAX having a 7.91% annualized return and IASMX not far ahead at 8.26%.
ASIAX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
IASMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
ASIAX vs. IASMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIAX Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund | 13.12% | 24.56% | 9.59% | 0.87% | -10.82% | -6.10% | 25.76% | 17.78% | -11.50% | 29.13% |
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund | 13.47% | 29.64% | 4.38% | 5.95% | -28.04% | -6.46% | 26.02% | 29.32% | -17.58% | 47.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIAX and IASMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1997 | 0.82 |
The correlation between ASIAX and IASMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASIAX vs. IASMX — Risk / Return Rank
ASIAX
IASMX
ASIAX vs. IASMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASIAX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.74 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.94 | 7.85 | +1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASIAX vs. IASMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIAX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, smaller than the maximum IASMX drawdown of -76.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIAX and IASMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIAX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.78% | -76.53% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -10.00% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.36% | -19.62% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.66% | -45.82% | +17.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.32% | -52.51% | +16.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -5.89% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -33.11% | +18.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.48% | +0.06% |
Volatility
ASIAX vs. IASMX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX) have volatilities of 7.88% and 7.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASIAX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 7.98% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 15.45% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.04% | 18.79% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 21.68% | -6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 20.84% | -5.38% |
ASIAX vs. IASMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IASMX's 1.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASIAX vs. IASMX - Dividend Comparison
ASIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.93%, more than IASMX's 6.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIAX Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund | 18.93% | 21.41% | 8.68% | 2.84% | 7.25% | 7.71% | 7.37% | 5.67% | 7.17% | 7.91% | 1.09% | 3.15% |
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund | 6.10% | 6.92% | 1.51% | 1.16% | 3.40% | 9.14% | 5.78% | 6.61% | 12.82% | 0.90% | 1.44% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASIAX and IASMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IASMX has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to ASIAX (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIAX dropped -63.78% vs IASMX's -76.53%.
ASIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASIAX and IASMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer