IASMX vs. MGSEX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

IASMX (Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund) and MGSEX (AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IASMX returned 8.01%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for MGSEX. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IASMX charges 1.98%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for MGSEX.

Performance

IASMX vs. MGSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX) and AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IASMX achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly lower than MGSEX's 25.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IASMX has underperformed MGSEX with an annualized return of 8.01%, while MGSEX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.

IASMX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 3.30%
• 6M: 10.10%
• YTD: 15.04%
• 1Y: 23.94%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 2.32%
• 10Y*: 8.01%
• ALL TIME*: 4.10%

MGSEX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -9.02%
• 6M: 11.97%
• YTD: 25.50%
• 1Y: 47.02%
• 3Y*: 22.43%
• 5Y*: 4.01%
• 10Y*: 15.00%
• ALL TIME*: 10.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IASMX vs. MGSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund	15.04%	29.64%	4.38%	5.95%	-28.04%	-6.46%	26.02%	29.32%	-17.58%	47.12%
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund	25.50%	41.56%	7.23%	-4.82%	-27.91%	0.83%	38.74%	80.58%	-3.77%	20.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IASMX and MGSEX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 1996	0.48

Over the past year, IASMX and MGSEX have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

IASMX vs. MGSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IASMX

IASMX Risk / Return Rank: 44
IASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
IASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
IASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

MGSEX

MGSEX Risk / Return Rank: 48
MGSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MGSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MGSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MGSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MGSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IASMX vs. MGSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX) and AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IASMX	MGSEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.57	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.96	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	1.99	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.90	7.20	-0.30

IASMX vs. MGSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IASMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the MGSEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IASMX and MGSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IASMX vs. MGSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IASMX drawdown since its inception was -76.53%, which is greater than MGSEX's maximum drawdown of -62.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASMX and MGSEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IASMX	MGSEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.53%	-62.06%	-14.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	-25.18%	+15.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.62%	-25.18%	+5.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.76%	-42.34%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.51%	-45.32%	-7.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.59%	-19.19%	+14.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.06%	-13.87%	-19.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	6.92%	-3.19%

Volatility

IASMX vs. MGSEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX) is 6.77%, while AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that IASMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IASMX	MGSEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.77%	12.61%	-5.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.94%	29.02%	-13.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.26%	31.98%	-12.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.62%	21.82%	-0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.90%	26.72%	-5.82%

IASMX vs. MGSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IASMX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MGSEX's 1.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

IASMX vs. MGSEX - Dividend Comparison

IASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than MGSEX's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund	6.02%	6.92%	1.51%	1.16%	3.40%	9.14%	5.78%	6.61%	12.82%	0.90%	1.44%	1.18%
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund	0.11%	0.14%	0.47%	0.11%	0.00%	83.77%	4.35%	59.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IASMX and MGSEX in my portfolio?

IASMX and MGSEX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IASMX or MGSEX?

MGSEX has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to IASMX (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IASMX dropped -76.53% vs MGSEX's -62.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.