ASIAX vs. FEAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX).
ASIAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Nov 2, 1997. FEAAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 1994.
Performance
ASIAX vs. FEAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASIAX vs. FEAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIAX Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund | 0.36% | 24.56% | 9.59% | 0.87% | -10.82% | -6.10% | 25.76% | 17.78% | -11.50% | 29.13% |
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A | 3.63% | 36.67% | 20.63% | 13.50% | -30.79% | -15.06% | 72.51% | 30.64% | -15.11% | 45.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIAX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than FEAAX's 3.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIAX has underperformed FEAAX with an annualized return of 7.29%, while FEAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.67% annualized return.
ASIAX
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
FEAAX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 36.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASIAX vs. FEAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FEAAX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASIAX vs. FEAAX — Risk / Return Rank
ASIAX
FEAAX
ASIAX vs. FEAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASIAX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.85 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 2.41 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.69 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 9.59 | -0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASIAX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.85 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.10 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.61 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.35 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIAX and FEAAX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ASIAX vs. FEAAX - Dividend Comparison
ASIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.34%, while FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIAX Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund | 21.34% | 21.41% | 8.68% | 2.84% | 7.25% | 7.71% | 7.37% | 5.67% | 7.17% | 7.91% | 1.09% | 3.15% |
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.88% | 6.62% | 5.21% | 6.49% | 0.03% | 1.10% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
ASIAX vs. FEAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIAX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FEAAX drawdown of -60.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIAX and FEAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIAX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.78% | -60.87% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -13.56% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -53.46% | +21.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.32% | -57.90% | +21.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.56% | -11.17% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -20.29% | +5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.81% | -0.89% |
Volatility
ASIAX vs. FEAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) is 7.36%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) has a volatility of 10.18%. This indicates that ASIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASIAX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 10.18% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 14.85% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 20.43% | -3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 22.58% | -7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 20.72% | -5.68% |