PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASIAX vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASIAX vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIAX achieves a 20.22% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 68.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIAX has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 8.95%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.90% annualized return.


ASIAX

1D
1.42%
1M
10.81%
YTD
20.22%
6M
22.86%
1Y
43.46%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
8.95%

EWT

1D
-0.20%
1M
18.24%
YTD
68.27%
6M
72.42%
1Y
110.37%
3Y*
38.34%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
19.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIAX vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASIAX
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund
20.22%24.56%9.59%0.87%-10.82%-6.10%25.76%17.78%-11.50%29.13%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
68.27%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIAX and EWT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2000

0.67

The correlation between ASIAX and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASIAX vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIAX
ASIAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ASIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIAX vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASIAXEWTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

4.42

-1.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.71

5.00

-1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.69

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

10.56

-6.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.61

32.40

-17.78

ASIAX vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 4.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIAX and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASIAXEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

4.42

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.82

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.92

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.26

+0.24

Drawdowns

ASIAX vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIAX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, roughly equal to the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIAX and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASIAXEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.78%

-64.37%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-10.51%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.36%

-25.66%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.71%

-38.88%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.32%

-38.88%

+2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.10%

-19.23%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.42%

-0.43%

Volatility

ASIAX vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) is 6.18%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that ASIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASIAXEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

10.43%

-4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.66%

20.52%

-7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

25.10%

-9.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

22.59%

-7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

21.60%

-6.37%

ASIAX vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASIAX vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

ASIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.81%, more than EWT's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASIAX
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund
17.81%21.41%8.68%2.84%7.25%7.71%7.37%5.67%7.17%7.91%1.09%3.15%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.63%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASIAX and EWT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to ASIAX (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIAX dropped -63.78% vs EWT's -64.37%.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASIAX and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer