ASIA vs. MINV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ASIA (Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF) and MINV (Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Matthews. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ASIA returned 58.06% vs 84.63% for MINV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

ASIA vs. MINV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIA achieves a 29.48% return, which is significantly lower than MINV's 55.42% return.

ASIA

• 1D: -6.60%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 29.48%
• 6M: 31.09%
• 1Y: 58.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINV

• 1D: -7.65%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 55.42%
• 6M: 56.47%
• 1Y: 84.63%
• 3Y*: 33.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIA vs. MINV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	29.48%	32.06%	3.41%	0.01%
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF	55.42%	30.85%	17.32%	7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIA and MINV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.91

The correlation between ASIA and MINV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

ASIA vs. MINV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ASIA	MINV
Technology	55.9%	67.2%
Financial Services	14.6%	1.4%
Industrials	9.2%	19.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	3.7%
Communication Services	3.9%	2.3%
Energy	3.0%	1.7%
Healthcare	2.9%	4.6%
Real Estate	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.4%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ASIA vs. MINV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIA

ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 76
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MINV

MINV Risk / Return Rank: 90
MINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MINV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MINV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIA vs. MINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASIA	MINV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.93	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.44	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.51	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	7.80	-3.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.27	19.55	-5.28

ASIA vs. MINV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the MINV Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIA and MINV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASIA vs. MINV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIA drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, roughly equal to the maximum MINV drawdown of -23.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA and MINV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASIA	MINV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	-23.49%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-10.91%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.60%	-7.65%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-8.03%	+3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	4.34%	-0.26%

Volatility

ASIA vs. MINV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) is 15.17%, while Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a volatility of 16.99%. This indicates that ASIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASIA	MINV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.17%	16.99%	-1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.95%	25.92%	-2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.30%	29.06%	-3.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.63%	24.78%	-3.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.63%	24.78%	-3.15%

ASIA vs. MINV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASIA and MINV have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

ASIA vs. MINV - Dividend Comparison

ASIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than MINV's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	0.81%	1.05%	0.58%	0.12%
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF	0.97%	1.51%	0.25%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASIA and MINV in my portfolio?

ASIA and MINV have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASIA or MINV?

MINV has higher volatility (16.99%) compared to ASIA (15.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIA dropped -23.95% vs MINV's -23.49%.

Which ETF is better, ASIA or MINV?

On 1-year performance, MINV leads with 84.63% vs 58.06% for ASIA. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ASIA has been the lower-risk option at 15.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASIA or MINV?

Over the 1-year period, MINV has performed better with a 84.63% return vs 58.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASIA or MINV?

ASIA and MINV have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASIA or MINV?

MINV has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.81% for ASIA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.