ASIA vs. EEMV
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV).
ASIA and EEMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASIA is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Sep 21, 2023. EEMV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011.
Performance
ASIA vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASIA vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF | 1.94% | 32.06% | 3.41% | 0.01% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.08% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 5.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIA achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly higher than EEMV's 1.08% return.
ASIA
- 1D
- 3.32%
- 1M
- -10.98%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 35.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- 1Y
- 13.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASIA vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASIA vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank
ASIA
EEMV
ASIA vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASIA | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 1.09 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 1.52 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 1.52 | +0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.98 | 5.82 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASIA | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.09 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.32 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIA and EEMV is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ASIA vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
ASIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than EEMV's 2.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF | 1.03% | 1.05% | 0.58% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.62% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
Drawdowns
ASIA vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIA drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum EEMV drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA and EEMV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIA | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -31.56% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -9.22% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.63% | -6.88% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -8.05% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 2.41% | +1.43% |
Volatility
ASIA vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) at 7.36%. This indicates that ASIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASIA | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.40% | 7.36% | +4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.54% | 9.48% | +7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 12.91% | +8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 11.48% | +7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 13.74% | +5.73% |