ASHX vs. KJD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) and KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASHX is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while KJD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares. ASHX is passively managed, while KJD is actively managed. ASHX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for KJD.

Performance

ASHX vs. KJD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KJD

• 1D: -3.79%
• 1M: -22.77%
• YTD: -14.42%
• 6M: -16.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHX vs. KJD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	-14.42%	-28.21%

Return for Risk

ASHX vs. KJD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ASHX	KJD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-49.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-42.84%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-29.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASHX	KJD	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	61.22%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	61.22%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	61.22%	—

ASHX vs. KJD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KJD's 1.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASHX vs. KJD - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASHX nor KJD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.38%	1.76%	0.84%	0.80%	1.78%	1.07%	2.48%	19.46%	2.91%
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ASHX or KJD?

On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASHX or KJD?

ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASHX or KJD?

ASHX and KJD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ASHX and KJD?

ASHX is categorized as China Equities, while KJD is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 1.26% for KJD.