ASHX vs. CAS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) and CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) are both China Equities funds. ASHX is passively managed, while CAS is actively managed. ASHX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for CAS.

Performance

ASHX vs. CAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAS

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHX vs. CAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF	-5.11%

Return for Risk

ASHX vs. CAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ASHX	CAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.11%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASHX	CAS	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.51%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.51%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.51%	—

ASHX vs. CAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CAS's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASHX vs. CAS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASHX nor CAS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.38%	1.76%	0.84%	0.80%	1.78%	1.07%	2.48%	19.46%	2.91%
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ASHX or CAS?

On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASHX or CAS?

ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASHX or CAS?

ASHX and CAS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ASHX and CAS?

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 0.88% for CAS.