PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ASHR vs. XCHA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ASHR vs. XCHA.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L).

ASHR and XCHA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. XCHA.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jun 27, 2012. Both ASHR and XCHA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ASHR vs. XCHA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASHR vs. XCHA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund		-0.64%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%
XCHA.L
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C		-1.40%30.08%16.02%-11.00%-24.25%3.24%45.85%40.57%-24.28%35.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly higher than XCHA.L's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has underperformed XCHA.L with an annualized return of 4.13%, while XCHA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.50% annualized return.

ASHR

1D
1.33%
1M
-4.25%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
1.30%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
-2.00%
10Y*
4.13%

XCHA.L

1D
0.14%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-1.40%
6M
1.94%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
7.82%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
7.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund

Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with ASHR:
ASHR vs. MCHIASHR vs. FXIASHR vs. CNYAASHR vs. ASHSASHR vs. SPYASHR vs. GXCASHR vs. CHAU
Often compared with XCHA.L:
XCHA.L vs. CSPX.LXCHA.L vs. VUAA.DEXCHA.L vs. HMCT.LXCHA.L vs. XCNA.LXCHA.L vs. IASH.LXCHA.L vs. CEBG.LXCHA.L vs. CA3S.L

ASHR vs. XCHA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XCHA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
XCHA.L
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C

Return for Risk

ASHR vs. XCHA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
XCHA.L
XCHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHR vs. XCHA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ASHRXCHA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.64

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

2.14

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.72

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.57

12.04

-2.48

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASHR vs. XCHA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHR and XCHA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ASHRXCHA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.64

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.05

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.33

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.26

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between ASHR and XCHA.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ASHR vs. XCHA.L - Dividend Comparison

ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, while XCHA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund		2.32%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
XCHA.L
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ASHR vs. XCHA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, roughly equal to the maximum XCHA.L drawdown of -50.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and XCHA.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ASHRXCHA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.30%

-50.88%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-10.54%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.44%

-40.71%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

-44.90%

-6.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.87%

-9.73%

-14.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.34%

-24.86%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.31%

+0.36%

Volatility

ASHR vs. XCHA.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L) at 5.49%. This indicates that ASHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCHA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ASHRXCHA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

5.49%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

11.27%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.63%

17.04%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

22.32%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

22.69%

+1.44%