ASGM vs. WAMA
ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. ASGM is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASGM charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
ASGM vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASGM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 24.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASGM vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 4.27% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASGM and WAMA is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASGM vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASGM | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.95 | 4.87 | -1.92 |
Drawdowns
ASGM vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASGM drawdown since its inception was -6.62%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -1.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGM and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASGM | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -1.91% | -4.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.73% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.22% | -0.39% | -0.83% |
Volatility
ASGM vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASGM | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 9.20% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 9.20% | +6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 9.20% | +6.47% |
ASGM vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASGM has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASGM vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
ASGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, while WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 3.69% | 4.52% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASGM and WAMA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.
ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for ASGM and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for ASGM and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer