ASCI vs. USL
ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ASCI is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by abrdn, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. ASCI is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. ASCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
ASCI vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCI achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 48.13% return.
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 44.56%
- YTD
- 48.13%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
ASCI vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 4.02% | 1.37% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 48.13% | -0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCI and USL is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCI vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
ASCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USL
ASCI vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASCI | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASCI vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCI drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCI and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCI | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -89.06% | +77.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -43.82% | +37.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -61.34% | +58.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.87% | — |
Volatility
ASCI vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCI | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 29.20% | -10.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 30.39% | -11.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 32.30% | -13.28% |
ASCI vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCI vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.77% | 0.80% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCI and USL have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASCI is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCI is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
ASCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
ASCI is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ASCI and 0.88% for USL.
Find the right allocation for ASCI and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer