ASCI vs. TDTT
ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) and TDTT (FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ASCI is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by abrdn, while TDTT is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. ASCI is actively managed, while TDTT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. ASCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for TDTT.
Performance
ASCI vs. TDTT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCI achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than TDTT's 1.81% return.
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDTT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
ASCI vs. TDTT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 7.39% | 1.11% |
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 1.81% | -0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCI and TDTT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCI vs. TDTT — Risk / Return Rank
ASCI
TDTT
ASCI vs. TDTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASCI | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.69 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
ASCI vs. TDTT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCI drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, which is greater than TDTT's maximum drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCI and TDTT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCI | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -6.97% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -0.14% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -1.60% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility
ASCI vs. TDTT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCI | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.68% | 1.85% | +16.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 3.67% | +15.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 3.38% | +15.30% |
ASCI vs. TDTT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TDTT's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCI vs. TDTT - Dividend Comparison
ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than TDTT's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.54% | 4.52% | 4.01% | 3.88% | 6.97% | 4.53% | 1.15% | 1.91% | 2.48% | 1.88% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCI and TDTT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ASCI.
TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.75% for ASCI.
ASCI is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while TDTT is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ASCI and 0.18% for TDTT.
Find the right allocation for ASCI and TDTT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer