ASCI vs. SCHC
ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. ASCI is actively managed, while SCHC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
ASCI vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCI achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than SCHC's 5.56% return.
ASCI
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
ASCI vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 4.49% | 1.37% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 5.56% | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCI and SCHC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCI vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
ASCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHC
ASCI vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASCI | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASCI vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCI drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, smaller than the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCI and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCI | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -43.94% | +32.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | -6.75% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -10.03% | +7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.44% | — |
Volatility
ASCI vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCI | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 16.36% | +3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 17.65% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 17.85% | +1.53% |
ASCI vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCI vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than SCHC's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.77% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.47% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCI and SCHC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ASCI.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.77% for ASCI.
They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ASCI and 0.08% for SCHC.
Find the right allocation for ASCI and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer