PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCH.DE achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly higher than CBUG.DE's 16.79% return.


ASCH.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.50%
6M
16.83%
YTD
25.21%
1Y
42.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBUG.DE

1D
0.33%
1M
0.66%
6M
10.07%
YTD
16.79%
1Y
30.77%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASCH.DE and CBUG.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2025

0.71

The correlation between ASCH.DE and CBUG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASCH.DE
ASCH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ASCH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASCH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASCH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ASCH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASCH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUG.DE
CBUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASCH.DECBUG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

4.23

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

15.83

-10.00

ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASCH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASCH.DE and CBUG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCH.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.54%, smaller than the maximum CBUG.DE drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCH.DE and CBUG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASCH.DECBUG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.54%

-24.57%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.54%

-7.24%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-2.08%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-7.33%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.27%

1.94%

+5.33%

Volatility

ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) at 3.78%. This indicates that ASCH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASCH.DECBUG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

3.78%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

10.23%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.72%

14.19%

+13.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.88%

16.63%

+9.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

16.63%

+9.25%

ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCH.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASCH.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASCH.DE nor CBUG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ASCH.DE and CBUG.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASCH.DE.

They also come from different issuers: abrdn and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASCH.DE and 0.10% for CBUG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASCH.DE and CBUG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer