PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (2B7J.DE).

ASCH.DE and 2B7J.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASCH.DE is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on May 9, 2025. 2B7J.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. It was launched on Oct 12, 2017.

Performance

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (2B7J.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
ASCH.DE
abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF		8.94%17.25%
2B7J.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		-1.18%7.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCH.DE achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly higher than 2B7J.DE's -1.18% return.

ASCH.DE

1D
4.09%
1M
-7.43%
YTD
8.94%
6M
13.47%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

2B7J.DE

1D
2.44%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
-1.18%
6M
1.08%
1Y
8.64%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with ASCH.DE:
ASCH.DE vs. MWOE.DEASCH.DE vs. GERD.DEASCH.DE vs. LWCR.DEASCH.DE vs. AVWC.DEASCH.DE vs. TSWE.DEASCH.DE vs. IS3Q.DEASCH.DE vs. CBUI.DE
Often compared with 2B7J.DE:
2B7J.DE vs. LYPS.DE2B7J.DE vs. QYLD2B7J.DE vs. FGQD.L2B7J.DE vs. VUAA.L2B7J.DE vs. VOO2B7J.DE vs. F50A.DE2B7J.DE vs. CSY9.DE

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCH.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7J.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.

ASCH.DE
abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF
2B7J.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Return for Risk

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ASCH.DE
2B7J.DE
2B7J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
2B7J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (2B7J.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ASCH.DE2B7J.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.53

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.57

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.14

0.69

+1.45

Correlation

The correlation between ASCH.DE and 2B7J.DE is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE - Dividend Comparison

ASCH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 2B7J.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ASCH.DE
abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
2B7J.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.26%1.23%1.37%1.55%1.74%1.15%1.28%1.68%

Drawdowns

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCH.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.06%, smaller than the maximum 2B7J.DE drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCH.DE and 2B7J.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ASCH.DE2B7J.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.06%

-32.11%

+21.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-12.42%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-21.26%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-4.97%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-5.26%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

2.36%

—

Volatility

ASCH.DE vs. 2B7J.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ASCH.DE2B7J.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

5.03%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

9.20%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

16.40%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

14.55%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

16.35%

-1.66%