CBUG.DE vs. EUNL.DE
CBUG.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - CBUG.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD while EUNL.DE tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUG.DE returned 13.75%/yr vs 17.55%/yr for EUNL.DE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBUG.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
CBUG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUG.DE achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly higher than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return.
CBUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 14.43%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
CBUG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUG.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) | 14.43% | 6.47% | 13.17% | 11.34% | -14.17% | 2.96% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUG.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CBUG.DE and EUNL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUG.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUG.DE
EUNL.DE
CBUG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUG.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 3.64 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.66 | 14.52 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUG.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 2.12 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.82 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
CBUG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUG.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUG.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -33.63% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.21% | -6.50% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.59% | -21.73% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.31% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -4.25% | -3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.64% | +0.30% |
Volatility
CBUG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that CBUG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUG.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 2.62% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 7.72% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 11.16% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 14.17% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 15.17% | +1.54% |
CBUG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUG.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBUG.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUG.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUG.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBUG.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUG.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer