ASCGX vs. HSPGX
ASCGX (Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund) and HSPGX (Emerald Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ASCGX returned 12.13%/yr vs 15.38%/yr for HSPGX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ASCGX charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for HSPGX.
Performance
ASCGX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCGX achieves a 19.01% return, which is significantly lower than HSPGX's 23.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ASCGX has underperformed HSPGX with an annualized return of 12.13%, while HSPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.
ASCGX
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -6.70%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 1Y
- 33.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.97%
HSPGX
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- 6M
- 17.08%
- YTD
- 23.61%
- 1Y
- 51.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ASCGX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCGX Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund | 19.01% | 9.80% | 27.71% | 4.36% | -37.35% | 10.35% | 52.78% | 25.62% | -1.96% | 28.28% |
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 23.61% | 31.62% | 28.04% | 18.66% | -24.65% | 3.59% | 38.49% | 28.33% | -12.16% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCGX and HSPGX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2004 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ASCGX and HSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCGX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
ASCGX
HSPGX
ASCGX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund (ASCGX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASCGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 3.44 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.26 | 12.12 | -4.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASCGX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCGX drawdown since its inception was -59.31%, roughly equal to the maximum HSPGX drawdown of -60.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCGX and HSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.31% | -60.28% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.24% | -14.41% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.25% | -28.63% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.73% | -38.65% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.73% | -41.48% | -9.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.39% | -10.45% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -18.94% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.07% | +0.10% |
Volatility
ASCGX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund (ASCGX) is 6.97%, while Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that ASCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | 8.22% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.95% | 21.56% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 27.62% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 25.90% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 25.30% | +0.43% |
ASCGX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCGX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HSPGX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCGX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison
ASCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCGX Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.72% | 30.62% | 7.05% | 2.20% | 4.36% | 26.72% | 1.67% | 5.31% |
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 10.31% | 12.74% | 21.85% | 6.43% | 8.77% | 19.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 11.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ASCGX and HSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HSPGX has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to ASCGX (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASCGX dropped -59.31% vs HSPGX's -60.28%.
HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASCGX and HSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer