ASCE vs. ESIX
ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) and ESIX (SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ASCE is actively managed, while ESIX is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASCE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ESIX.
Performance
ASCE vs. ESIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASCE
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 28.36%
- 6M
- 23.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASCE vs. ESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 28.36% | 8.46% |
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 10.83% | 5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCE and ESIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCE vs. ESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASCE vs. ESIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCE | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | — | — |
Volatility
ASCE vs. ESIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCE | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | — | — |
ASCE vs. ESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIX's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCE vs. ESIX - Dividend Comparison
ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than ESIX's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 1.05% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.69% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCE and ESIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.
ESIX has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.
They also come from different issuers: Allspring and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ASCE and 0.12% for ESIX.
Find the right allocation for ASCE and ESIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer