PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASCE vs. ALIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASCE vs. ALIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCE achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly higher than ALIL's 7.70% return.


ASCE

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.38%
YTD
22.25%
6M
21.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ALIL

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.83%
YTD
7.70%
6M
7.61%
1Y
12.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCE vs. ALIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
22.25%8.61%
ALIL
Argent Focused Small Cap ETF
7.70%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ASCE and ALIL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASCE vs. ALIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASCE

ALIL
ALIL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ALIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALIL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ALIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALIL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCE vs. ALIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASCE vs. ALIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASCEALILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

0.69

+1.22

Drawdowns

ASCE vs. ALIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCE drawdown since its inception was -9.22%, smaller than the maximum ALIL drawdown of -12.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCE and ALIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASCEALILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-12.60%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.32%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-3.18%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

Volatility

ASCE vs. ALIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASCEALILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

18.50%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

18.92%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

18.92%

+0.33%

ASCE vs. ALIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ALIL's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASCE vs. ALIL - Dividend Comparison

ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than ALIL's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ALIL
Argent Focused Small Cap ETF
0.44%0.47%
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
0.18%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASCE and ALIL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.

ALIL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ASCE and 0.74% for ALIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASCE and ALIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer