PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASBAX vs. TNSHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASBAX vs. TNSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASBAX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than TNSHX's 0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ASBAX has underperformed TNSHX with an annualized return of 1.61%, while TNSHX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.83% annualized return.


ASBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.66%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.60%
10Y*
1.61%

TNSHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.96%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
1.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASBAX vs. TNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
0.35%5.05%4.31%3.60%-4.16%-0.88%3.53%2.81%1.10%0.91%
TNSHX
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.61%5.31%4.03%4.05%-3.96%-0.57%3.26%4.05%1.31%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ASBAX and TNSHX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.75

The correlation between ASBAX and TNSHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASBAX vs. TNSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASBAX
ASBAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ASBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ASBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

TNSHX
TNSHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TNSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TNSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASBAX vs. TNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASBAXTNSHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.51

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.32

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

12.42

-3.03

ASBAX vs. TNSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the TNSHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASBAX and TNSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASBAXTNSHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.01

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.82

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

1.01

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.04

-0.08

Drawdowns

ASBAX vs. TNSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASBAX drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, which is greater than TNSHX's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASBAX and TNSHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASBAXTNSHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-5.99%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

-1.13%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

-1.13%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.23%

-5.99%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.29%

-5.99%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.15%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-0.89%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.30%

+0.04%

Volatility

ASBAX vs. TNSHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) is 0.57%, while TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that ASBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASBAXTNSHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.63%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

1.38%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

1.88%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

2.25%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.83%

1.82%

+0.01%

ASBAX vs. TNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASBAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than TNSHX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASBAX vs. TNSHX - Dividend Comparison

ASBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than TNSHX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
3.76%3.87%3.99%2.88%1.02%0.42%2.08%1.66%1.70%1.21%0.83%1.21%
TNSHX
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund
4.10%4.22%3.94%2.68%1.00%1.03%1.81%2.45%1.80%1.31%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASBAX and TNSHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNSHX has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to ASBAX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASBAX dropped -6.29% vs TNSHX's -5.99%.

TNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASBAX and TNSHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer