PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASBAX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASBAX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASBAX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ASBAX having a 1.58% annualized return and BND not far behind at 1.55%.


ASBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.34%
1Y
2.72%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
1.58%

BND

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASBAX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
0.03%5.05%4.31%3.60%-4.16%-0.88%3.53%2.81%1.10%0.91%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.38%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ASBAX and BND is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.60

The correlation between ASBAX and BND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASBAX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASBAX
ASBAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ASBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ASBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASBAX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASBAXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.64

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

4.69

+3.41

ASBAX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASBAX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASBAX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASBAX drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASBAX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASBAXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-18.58%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

-2.68%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

-5.92%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.03%

-17.91%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.29%

-18.58%

+12.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-2.26%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-3.06%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.93%

-0.58%

Volatility

ASBAX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) is 0.66%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that ASBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASBAXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

1.08%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

2.77%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

3.74%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.24%

6.03%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.83%

5.54%

-3.71%

ASBAX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASBAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASBAX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

ASBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than BND's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
3.77%3.87%3.99%2.88%1.02%0.42%2.08%1.66%1.70%1.21%0.83%1.21%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASBAX and BND have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BND has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to ASBAX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASBAX dropped -6.29% vs BND's -18.58%.

ASBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASBAX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer