ASBAX vs. GSSRX
ASBAX (American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America) and GSSRX (Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, ASBAX returned 1.58%/yr vs 2.41%/yr for GSSRX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASBAX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for GSSRX.
Performance
ASBAX vs. GSSRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASBAX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than GSSRX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ASBAX has underperformed GSSRX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while GSSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.41% annualized return.
ASBAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
GSSRX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
ASBAX vs. GSSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASBAX American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America | 0.03% | 5.05% | 4.31% | 3.60% | -4.16% | -0.88% | 3.53% | 2.81% | 1.10% | 0.91% |
GSSRX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund | 0.72% | 6.57% | 4.53% | 5.28% | -6.06% | -0.86% | 5.85% | 6.79% | -0.02% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASBAX and GSSRX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.66 |
The correlation between ASBAX and GSSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.78 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASBAX vs. GSSRX — Risk / Return Rank
ASBAX
GSSRX
ASBAX vs. GSSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASBAX | GSSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.90 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | 12.69 | -4.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASBAX vs. GSSRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASBAX drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum GSSRX drawdown of -9.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASBAX and GSSRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASBAX | GSSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -9.03% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.24% | -1.62% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.24% | -1.62% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.03% | -8.88% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.29% | -9.03% | +2.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.20% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -1.26% | +0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 0.37% | -0.02% |
Volatility
ASBAX vs. GSSRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) is 0.66%, while Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) has a volatility of 0.72%. This indicates that ASBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASBAX | GSSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 0.72% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.43% | 1.80% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87% | 2.24% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.24% | 2.43% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.83% | 2.42% | -0.59% |
ASBAX vs. GSSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASBAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GSSRX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASBAX vs. GSSRX - Dividend Comparison
ASBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than GSSRX's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASBAX American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America | 3.77% | 3.87% | 3.99% | 2.88% | 1.02% | 0.42% | 2.08% | 1.66% | 1.70% | 1.21% | 0.83% | 1.21% |
GSSRX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund | 4.35% | 4.18% | 3.58% | 2.36% | 1.59% | 1.40% | 2.20% | 2.87% | 2.56% | 2.21% | 2.04% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASBAX and GSSRX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSSRX has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to ASBAX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASBAX dropped -6.29% vs GSSRX's -9.03%.
GSSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASBAX and GSSRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer