PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASBAX vs. ANCFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASBAX vs. ANCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASBAX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than ANCFX's 14.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ASBAX has underperformed ANCFX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while ANCFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.


ASBAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
0.34%
1Y
2.51%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
1.56%

ANCFX

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.90%
YTD
14.25%
6M
13.93%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
25.26%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASBAX vs. ANCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
-0.07%5.05%4.31%3.60%-4.16%-0.88%3.53%2.81%1.10%0.91%
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
14.25%24.21%22.73%25.86%-16.66%22.43%14.92%27.07%-8.13%22.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ASBAX and ANCFX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2006

-0.12

The correlation between ASBAX and ANCFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASBAX vs. ANCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASBAX
ASBAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ASBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ASBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ANCFX
ANCFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ANCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ANCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASBAX vs. ANCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASBAXANCFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.05

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.41

13.74

-6.32

ASBAX vs. ANCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the ANCFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASBAX and ANCFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASBAX vs. ANCFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASBAX drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum ANCFX drawdown of -53.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASBAX and ANCFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASBAXANCFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-53.29%

+47.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

-10.66%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

-17.97%

+16.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.03%

-25.07%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.29%

-33.93%

+27.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.77%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-7.31%

+6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

2.36%

-2.01%

Volatility

ASBAX vs. ANCFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) is 0.63%, while American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that ASBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASBAXANCFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

5.61%

-4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

11.72%

-10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

14.65%

-12.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.24%

16.94%

-14.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.84%

17.80%

-15.96%

ASBAX vs. ANCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASBAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ANCFX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASBAX vs. ANCFX - Dividend Comparison

ASBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than ANCFX's 7.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
7.30%8.54%8.90%5.80%4.98%10.97%2.61%6.91%9.31%7.28%4.71%6.08%
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
3.78%3.87%3.99%2.88%1.02%0.42%2.08%1.66%1.70%1.21%0.83%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASBAX and ANCFX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANCFX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to ASBAX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASBAX dropped -6.29% vs ANCFX's -53.29%.

ANCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASBAX and ANCFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer