PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AS vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AS vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amer Sports, Inc (AS) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AS achieves a -5.06% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 12.57% return.


AS

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-5.06%
6M
-7.56%
1Y
-5.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLOK

1D
1.33%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
12.57%
6M
5.60%
1Y
24.42%
3Y*
50.68%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AS vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
-5.06%33.58%108.66%
BLOK
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF
12.57%32.64%69.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AS and BLOK is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AS vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AS
AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AS vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amer Sports, Inc (AS) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.13

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

0.69

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

1.49

-1.85

AS vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AS and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AS vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AS drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AS and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-73.33%

+32.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.78%

-35.64%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.49%

-12.97%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-26.03%

+12.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.56%

16.41%

-1.85%

Volatility

AS vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amer Sports, Inc (AS) is 10.17%, while Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 13.34%. This indicates that AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

13.34%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.10%

30.02%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.31%

39.18%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.55%

42.53%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.55%

39.05%

+10.50%

Dividends

AS vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLOK
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF
0.64%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


AS and BLOK have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLOK has higher volatility (13.34%) compared to AS (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AS dropped -40.71% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AS and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer