ARTY vs. TINY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ARTY (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) and TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ARTY tracks the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index (Net) while TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ARTY returned 24.09%/yr vs 27.14%/yr for TINY. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARTY charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for TINY.

Performance

ARTY vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARTY achieves a 37.17% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 55.32% return.

ARTY

• 1D: -3.96%
• 1M: -12.00%
• 6M: 29.64%
• YTD: 37.17%
• 1Y: 57.99%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: —

TINY

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -7.89%
• 6M: 33.37%
• YTD: 55.32%
• 1Y: 83.39%
• 3Y*: 27.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARTY vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	37.17%	29.97%	8.02%	36.37%	-37.89%	-5.76%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	55.32%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	-34.14%	8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ARTY and TINY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021	0.83

The correlation between ARTY and TINY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARTY vs. TINY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARTY	TINY
Technology	89.8%	70.5%
Industrials	4.3%	4.8%
Communication Services	3.1%	-
Utilities	1.3%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Financial Services	0.7%	-
Healthcare	0.5%	10.4%
Basic Materials	-	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

ARTY vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARTY

ARTY Risk / Return Rank: 61
ARTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ARTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ARTY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ARTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ARTY Martin Ratio Rank: 64

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 84
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 76
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARTY vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARTY	TINY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	2.26	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.76	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.36	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	5.00	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.06	15.29	-6.24

ARTY vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTY and TINY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARTY vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTY drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than TINY's maximum drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTY and TINY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARTY	TINY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.50%	-43.79%	-10.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.81%	-16.75%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.44%	-42.13%	+9.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.16%	-14.81%	-3.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.69%	-15.90%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.42%	5.47%	+0.95%

Volatility

ARTY vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) is 13.31%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 16.86%. This indicates that ARTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARTY	TINY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	16.86%	-3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.53%	31.43%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.60%	37.06%	-1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.90%	33.14%	-3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.43%	33.14%	-4.71%

ARTY vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARTY has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARTY vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

ARTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than TINY's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	0.07%	0.00%	0.50%	0.88%	0.75%	2.41%	0.53%	0.69%	0.34%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.17%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARTY and TINY in my portfolio?

ARTY and TINY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARTY or TINY?

TINY has higher volatility (16.86%) compared to ARTY (13.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARTY dropped -54.50% vs TINY's -43.79%.

Which ETF is better, ARTY or TINY?

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 27.14% vs 24.09% for ARTY. On fees, ARTY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ARTY has been the lower-risk option at 13.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARTY or TINY?

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 27.14% return vs 24.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARTY or TINY?

ARTY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARTY or TINY?

TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.07% for ARTY.

What is the main difference between ARTY and TINY?

ARTY tracks Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index (Net), while TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ARTY and 0.58% for TINY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.