PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARTY vs. DRGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARTY vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARTY achieves a 38.42% return, which is significantly higher than DRGN's 8.73% return.


ARTY

1D
0.60%
1M
-6.25%
6M
29.47%
YTD
38.42%
1Y
57.81%
3Y*
25.12%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.64%

DRGN

1D
3.34%
1M
-0.11%
6M
-2.24%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
34.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
36.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.04M$40.00M$59.74M
$390.32K$398.54K$552.05K

ARTY vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARTY and DRGN is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARTY vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARTY
ARTY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ARTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGN
DRGN Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DRGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRGN Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DRGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRGN Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARTY vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARTYDRGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.55

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

3.10

+4.15

ARTY vs. DRGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the DRGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTY and DRGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARTY vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTY drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTY and DRGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARTYDRGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

-20.86%

-33.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.00%

-20.86%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.41%

-13.29%

-4.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.68%

-8.39%

-11.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.42%

10.42%

-3.00%

Volatility

ARTY vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) has a higher volatility of 14.17% compared to Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) at 12.89%. This indicates that ARTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARTYDRGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.17%

12.89%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.16%

25.82%

+7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.34%

36.63%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.29%

36.03%

-5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.64%

36.03%

-7.39%

ARTY vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARTY has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARTY vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

ARTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than DRGN's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
0.07%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%
DRGN
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
1.12%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARTY and DRGN have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARTY has higher volatility (14.17%) compared to DRGN (12.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARTY dropped -54.50% vs DRGN's -20.86%.

On 1-year performance, ARTY leads with 57.81% vs 34.63% for DRGN. On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DRGN has been the lower-risk option at 12.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ARTY has performed better with a 57.81% return vs 34.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ARTY.

DRGN has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.07% for ARTY.

ARTY tracks Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index (Net), while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ARTY and 0.39% for DRGN.

ARTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARTY and DRGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer